Ross fumes against sharia byelaws in Indonesia.
Jakarta Post 16th Feb,tells us that Home Minister Mardiyanto “did not see any need to review the so-called sharia bye-laws enforced in many regions, the minister claimed there was no such thing”. He said:
Explicitly, there are no “sharia bye-laws”. What exist are byelaws that implement the Islamic do’s and don’ts, but in a more specific manner.
Oh well, that’s okay then.
Despite the differences in the implementation of the bye-laws, they all have one thing in common – to ensure that aspects of life are conducted based on Islamic teachings.
Happily, some decent Muslims are speaking up, notably the Wahid Institute’s Azyurmadi Azra and Ahmad Suaidy. Suaidy, the director of the Wahid Institute, said:
The enforcement of sharia bye-laws also leads to classifying non-Muslims as second-class citizens, which is against the Constitution.
Quite so. Dhimmi status.
The Minister claims that in Aceh, for example, the disputed regulations were only applied to Muslims. In other words, the entire principle of the rule of law, one law for all citizens, is discarded by Indonesia. At the behest of bigots like the FPI and its “respectable” big brother, the MUI, the state will tell women how they may dress.
If two friends of different faiths go shopping in Bandar Aceh, one may be arrested for going unscarfed, while her Christian pal goes unmolested. (Of course the sharia goons will have to apprehend both for a while, to check their ID cards!) IT IS NOT THE STATE’S BUSINESS!
We non-Muslims already have to submit to the dictates of the dogmatists when not just Muslim businesses but all entertainment centres are forcibly closed down on “holy days”. This manifest mistrust of their own following (who would, in the government’s eyes, presumably flock to nightclubs if they were left open) impacts on Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and everybody, only because the mullahs fear their “subjects” disobedience!
In some parts of the country, you can’t buy a beer because the clerics have declared prohibition. Christians and others who don’t have any rules on alcohol therefore suffer unfair treatment, just because the goons reckon the Muslim-in-the-street will splurge his wages on booze, if supplies are available! It’s pathetic!
We non-Muslims already have to submit to the dictates of the dogmatists when not just Muslim businesses but all entertainment centres are forcibly closed down on “holy days”.
While we’re at it on religious laws closing things down, no shutting down Bali for Nyepi. No intimidation of non-Hindus for failing to follow the dictates of that holiday either then (get ready to be pelted by rocks should you do). How come Bali and all its special religious considerations never come up in these conversations on religious laws in Indonesia?
If two friends of different faiths go shopping in Bandar Aceh, one may be arrested for going unscarfed, while her Christian pal goes unmolested. (Of course the sharia goons will have to apprehend both for a while, to check their ID cards!) IT IS NOT THE STATE’S BUSINESS!
Well, that’s actually not true. Wearing a jilbab is not mandatory in Aceh. Of course it is encouraged and expected but not prescribed by qanun (by-law). At the current stage, what is actually regulated by syariah qanuns in Aceh is a) drinking, b) gambling, c) extra-marital relations.
Lairedion, are you muslim? You are not but somewhat I find you were more than a JP
Haven’t you seen enough of those nonsense!
So every religion should have what you so called observe that particular day as holy day and that those in the night life business should close chop. Fine but have you ever thought the following:
1. Ramadhan how many days? 30.
2. Christmas – 1
3. Hindhu / Buddhist Nyepi – 1
See the difference? And haven’t you seen enough of those FPI morons who were creating terrors during the recent Ramadhan and they also said they will protect the Christians during Christmas last.
I can only summed up that you comments were merely but just to make your presence felt no more no less.
If a person has to get angry on certain comments then he/she should not be writing in these blogs.
Nyepi to all are for Hindhus whereas Waisak is for Buddhist.
The only difference in Hindhu and Buddhist is that Hindus are more obssess with dieties whereas Buddha is to Himself. Taoist who are majority Buddhist are more obssess with dieties too. But Hindhus and Buddhist are the same.
@ dragonwall
If a person has to get angry on certain comments then he/she should not be writing in these blogs.
Uh .. our cranky cockatoo doing a backflip. Weren’t you the one who wanted me ban from this blog, and others for having different views?
Nyepi to all are for Hindhus whereas Waisak is for Buddhist.
Salam for Islam 🙂
The only difference in Hindhu and Buddhist is that Hindus are more obssess with dieties whereas Buddha is to Himself. Taoist who are majority Buddhist are more obssess with dieties too. But Hindhus and Buddhist are the same.
Islam is obsessed with Peace.
Have you seen dieties? Do you know who is the Buddha? What were the difference?
Everyone is trying to big brother the others just because they have nothing to do in their free time but just reproducing.
Read carefully I said “whereas Buddha is to Himself”. Did I said he was obsess?
Despite the differences in the implementation of the bye-laws, they all have one thing in common – to ensure that aspects of life are conducted based on Islamic teachings.
Is that what your so called holiday discussions? Pushy and nagging Bigots thinks that way when Islamic clerics are insisting other religions run their life base on Islamic teaching.
So does that make yours or mine comment irrelvant?
And that copy cat mole face dick chum…you make me laugh with your obsessions.
I Sure Like Arse Man.
Can somebody explain why the minister of Home Affairs thinks he has the authority to comment on this subject?
I understand SBY asked his predecessor (the former Home Affairs minister that is) to examine whether the by-laws are contradicting higher national laws or not, but isn’t it up to the Supreme Court to give the answer?
Can somebody explain to me why the Supreme Court until now hasn’t done so? It seems to me that the ‘problem’ of the by-laws, in this stage, is a judicial one and not (yet) a political.
Dear Janma,
due to it being in once sentence with the qualifier
Then I should have break it to be more understandable.
The difference between Buddha and Dieties are:
Dieties were worship upon because they did things in that benefits the community. There were never any predecessor before them.
Buddha is a re-incarnation of an earlier Buddha. For example There were four Buddhas
Amitaba, Laughing Buddha, Mitra Buddha, and Sakyamuni Buddha. They have attain enlightenment to become a Buddha and one after another they pass on the reincarnation whereas the Sakyamuni Buddha was the last reincarnation. They were never obssessed with any othere dieties except they themselves observe the true way of life. “If you follow the true way of life, you could also attain enlightenment”.
Buddhist followers worship the Buddha, as respect, in hope of trying to achieve something.
Whereas Dieties were once some sort of hero or martyr and people worship upon them to gain something.
Between the Hindhus and Taoist both followers (Most Taoist are Buddhist followers though some maintain their way following the Taoist preaching) they prayed upon their dieties to gain certain they hoped to get in life. For example you hope to be rich and you pray to them then out the blue moon something came up and you became rich for whatever reason I won’t know. Perhaps they have done something good and being rewarded with the windfall perhaps.
When praying to the Buddha, unless you were able to abide to the true way of life, you will not be achieving anything or something. The teaching itself is emptiness.
“ou belief it’s there, it’s there and if you belief it’s not there then it will not be there”
The Buddha achieve enlightment and that they possess nothing. No greed, No drugs, No family, No Self, No sex, No Booze, No meat strictly vegetarian. No earthly possession whereas Dieties does have earthly possession.
The difference is a world wide apart.
When she pointed out to me that the sentence ending in such a manner will make people like you without a sense of deduction find it hard to understand.
The problem is that you have not seen things hapenning to others, whereas people like you should open yourself up and not clinging to your heritage.
Clowns like you won’t understand those who prayed to dieties so you should go and learn something from the Chinese. As I said it was just an example and is directing to Janma. Yeah I suppose so otherwise there won’t be people like you coming out from the forest and be open up to this new world finding you enclosure somehow crowded.
Take a trip to Medan, Riau Islands, Batam and find more about Chinese Dieties.
Want to know about diety? During the 98 riot there was this pri guy who robbed a vihara in Ujung Pandang (Most of the Chinese there came from China long time ago) of a certain diety and trying to have it sold. He went mad. He is a comedian like you finding things amusing and had no respect for other religion. Check the story out maybe this is another comedy. Since you were an Iban Dayak, right. Then you must have participated in the 1999 civil conflict between Maduras? But for that I really doubted that so much because you don’t have a belief, at least to say for other religion. And one thing you tend to jump into the conclusion like some of them.
If you have then you tell me about your belief. If don’t then introspect yourself and not be bias on other religion like in the Palestinian conflicts. Because I have seen what happened during the 1999 conflict right up to early 2000. Don’t even know where were you.
@ Lairedion
Beware! T’is the person who claim to win in every debates. His focus is to ‘win’ by any cost, not explain, brother. I think he won again. 🙂
I would simply say that people like you and the mole face {his new efigy} are but a bunch of chikadees that is not into any kind of debates but only want people to know that you knew something which you don’t really in fact.
I am actually putting something up if you read carefully, to both of you, to see how well you really are into Kalimantan and dayaks when coming into this topic. which in this case it seemed you might not know anything. So it’s no point discussing.
Go on you scratch his back he scratches yours.
When a person comment something and make sense, whether winning a debate or not will seem outright and I don’t need people like him to tell me his opinion.
I suppose this is the sole purpose of this blog.
@ dragonwall
There is a clear distinction between ‘debate’ and ‘swearing competition’. A ‘debate’ is a discussion involving opposing viewpoints. ‘Swearing competition’ is what you excelled in.
Despite of all this, this swearing and name calling makes it more fun to read though”¦
LOL, he would be the last person I wanted to see go away. Even though I only completed college, one always feel intellectually and culturally superior among people like him. Certainly, not all men are made equal. Some like him need to be restrained by Shariah.
Kiss My Arse.. Tell me where in which area was the swearing?
If both of you back scratching buddies are into debates then it should have been directed to it and end with something concrete instead of things like ‘so I don’t know””I am not an Islam kind of crap”.
Neither of you did and worst of all the mole face is omnipresence when coming to provocation. How nice, at least I learned something that could probably be the trade marks of Dayaks..or half bred. (You’re not even a Dayak)
Oh Yeah one thing I didn’t know the mole face have been scratching a Christian friend’s back since he claims he is not an Islam and I thought he hated Christians and the kind of “White Trash” he claims.
You mediocres should be taking the center stage at Ancol and you have the whole population saluting to your twisting, turning and denials.
Oh one more thing. I am beginning to like it as it is about to turn into another debate like Yusril’s.
When you questioned someone and were given a reply where you didn’t know how to react you move on to others comment abruptly.
You know why, when I reply to someone comments you began to be suspicious that others are directing to you.
Same thing to the mole face who claims to be a Javanese in Kalimantan which I really suspect he is a Madurese.
Lairdion, I tried not to have direct conflict by not mentioning names and it seems that you are up to something right? So okay come lets have it.
Tell me which words like Clowns, Chikadees. Mole Face, mediocres, scratching buddies are made up of foul scent? After all you started all those craps first, ain’t that right? (Drakenmurr until you explain because I don’t take cheese) Comedians.
Try introspecting your self before you make a comment. You two seemd to be scratching buddies to me if you look carefully on all those remarks. Of course I earlier mentioned that he kept changing his avatar with the distinct mole in his face.
Being a Dutch, Half bred, Non Muslim, You can’t be a Chinese right! Or Hindhus. Oh yes a Zionist Aborigine Jews, I am sorry my apology. You belief in trees and animals.
And that is what they call a sense of deduction.
@ Lairedion
Gee, me thinks he won again. 🙂
Brother, I think you have to concede defeat, afterall ‘name-callings’ are only the language he knew.
Allah swt had made his brain rigid. He is the same old fish that get caught on the same old baits; the same old fish that I had to unhook and throw it back to the filthy drain over and over again.
Being a Dutch, Half bred, Non Muslim, You can’t be a Chinese right! Or Hindhus. Oh yes a Zionist Aborigine Jews, I am sorry my apology. You belief in trees and animals.
Another masterpiece. This one is hard to beat. LOL
Copyright Indonesia Matters 2006-2023
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact
It is the Justice Minister that have the say and not Home Ministry who have control over the religion and their so called religious laws. Anything that went beyond the jurisdiction of state law shall be deemed void and useless unless being made into the Statute. If the Parliament and Congress does not approve that to be enacted then they cannot be leash into public enforcement against any other minority groups for them to abide by their religious laws.
If every religion were to have their own by-laws then does that make the Indonesian UU45 and the Constitutional Law look stupid that will really is consider to have mud rub in his face.
No other countries in the world will any longer have faith in Indonesia and the Indonesian Government. The more we will see Indonesia drift backward into the black age and more capital flights amidst the weak economy and currencies. This will sent commodities spiralling upward and and increase in crime rates as more and more unemployed roam the street.