President Yudhoyono asks the media to not report inappropriate news stories.
In a speech marking National Press Day on 9th February President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono asked journalists and media outlets to exercise self-censorship, given that the time of government control over the press is over.
He told about 500 journalists and media people present: waspada
I really want to see “self censoring” put into practice. I have hope that the Press Board, senior journalists and reporters, and leaders of journalists’ associations will employ the principle of determining what is appropriate news and what is not.
Freedom of the press was much valued in Indonesia now, he said, and the country would not go back to the bad old days of active state interference in the media, but freedom had limits:
We are for freedom of the press but [in a way that is] useful, with good character, and responsible.
He mentioned detik the example of the Danish newspaper “Jyllands-Posten”, which published cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad in September 2005, and which were also featured by Indonesian newspaper Rakyat Merdeka, on its website. The newspaper’s editor, Teguh Santosa, was later prosecuted.
We should learn a lesson from the case.
Other people’s rights, freedoms and sensibilities had to be respected, he said, especially when religion was involved:
Religion is very sensitive because it’s bound up with beliefs and emotions. Other people’s religious beliefs may appear irrational to us but we have to respect them.
The President also said the media should be careful in reporting violent incidents such as demonstrations, should use well-formed language, be idealistic, help in the development of the nation, be uplifting, truthful, and fair and balanced.
“people’s religious beliefs may appear irrational to us but we have to respect them”
As an agnostic, yes I agree with the first part of this, however….I am born free. I am born with the inalienable right to openly criticize and express my views. Sometimes my beliefs may offend you, but it is no more than yours may offend me.
I will respect and fight for your right to believe in any religion you want, but I also DEMAND the right to not believe in any and express myself openly.
Re
I just made a tee shirt that says, “Dear God, Don’t worry, I don’t believe everything everyone says about you”¦”
Which God you refering to: Allah Subhana Wata’ alla or Jehovah?
Amin.
Is this a presidential definition of modern journalism: freedom of press with built-in censorship?
SBY is not only a cunning president of a major country, but he must be a skilled sick joker as well.
Come on folk, he simply called for responsible journalism. That’s a very reasonable request.
We are for freedom of the press but [in a way that is] useful, with good character, and responsible.
How nice it was during Orba, wasn’t it Mr. President? Everybody smiled and shut up.
Religion is very sensitive because it’s bound up with beliefs and emotions. Other people’s religious beliefs may appear irrational to us but we have to respect them.
Somebody concocts a fairy-tale, then calls it a religion and then you expect me to respect it ???
Just give me one good reason.
Respect
“¢ People’s lives: yes, within reason
“¢ People’s property: yes, within reason
“¢ People’s right to a decent living: yes, unconditionally
“¢ People’s ideologies: what for?
“Religion is very sensitive because it’s bound up with beliefs and emotions. Other people’s religious beliefs may appear irrational to us but we have to respect them.”
What this guy is trying to say is: Kaffir should respect sharia, jihad and be ready to be dhimmitude.
Usually in the media whether in Indonesia or worldwide, they are all the same
Smoke cloud.
They don’t really mean what they have in their heart but just to please the public. Plain deceit, like Bakrie, Jusuf Kalla, Habibie, Yusril, Wiranto and many of those liken to greedy moron that were trying to get the max for their efforts in politics.
I suppose SBY had too many people tying his hands that the media does not submit to those who are rich or powerful in publishing news to distort the public and giving the government a hard time.
If it is the truth then they should not hide the fact, but the problems is that who will be protecting these media people?
People’s ideologies: what for?
ummm….. so that they will respect ours maybe?
Somebody concocts a fairy-tale, then calls it a religion and then you expect me to respect it ???
Just wondering would you be referring to Christianity and Islam there?
Yeah Pak Dewa…. don’t you believe in the Balinese fairy tale? what if no one respected that fairy tale? Would probably not be here today.
Dear Indonesian Media,
Please do not write about anything controversial. If you do, you may lose your right to do so, which you will hopefully never exercise.
Signed,
Uncomfortable with Democracy
Janma
Yeah Pak Dewa”¦. don’t you believe in the Balinese fairy tale? what if no one respected that fairy tale? Would probably not be here today.
I didn’t say that I don’t respect any fairy tale. I just refuse to be demanded or imposed to respect a fairy tale. Respect in the meaning that one isn’t allowed to criticize or to reject. And be assured that there are issues in the Balinese fairy tale that I strongly object too: manak salah a.o.
Oigal
Just wondering would you be referring to Christianity and Islam there?
Yes, I do.
Lairedion
Well done, Danish newspapers. Don’t bow down to the terrorists. Freedom of speech!
These Danes are real Vikings. Hey ho”¦ hey ho”¦
Well done, Danish newspapers. Don’t bow down to the terrorists. Freedom of speech!
There’s not really anyone worth supporting on either side of that argument. The Danish cartoons were about as tasteful as someone publishing a cartoon of a Jew with a hooked nose counting up dollar bills (see perhaps Sabili if you need examples), and as a result are hardly the best poster child for freedom of speech. On the other hand you don’t see Jews getting pissed off and turning over cars every time someone scribbles up a anti-semitic cartoon either.
Denmark is a democratic, secular society where freedom of speech and press is held in high regard. Religion is a highly personal matter. You are free to practice Islam within the boundaries of Danish law. Muslims choose to live in Denmark themselves. If they don’t feel comfortable, nobody or nothing is stopping them from moving back to Turkey, Morocco or Tunisia. It’s a free choice.
That’s not completely true. Muslims are treated much worse in Denmark than they are in neighboring Sweden or Norway. It wasn’t until after the cartoon crisis, for example, that the Danish government allowed Muslims to build any cemeteries. Cemetaries! Every multicountry poll shows Denmark to be one of the most racist in the EU and that its ethnic and religious minorities feel more aggrieved than in most other EU countries. Sure this is still a lot better than, say, the way Christians are treated in Saudi Arabia or Jews in Indonesia (what few there are of either), but it’s not exactly multicultural paradise either.
Does that make it right, though? Can’t the oppressed anywhere “just leave?” Truth is, it’s neither that simple nor justifiable on those grounds.
First of all, things develop over time. I doubt many of the Muslims who came to Denmark in the 1960s faced anything remotely close to the situation there is today. Denmark only developed xenophobic politics in the 1990s. So most of the Muslims in Denmark were there before it became a relatively nasty place for them. By then they have family roots down, businesses and other responsibilities that keep them from leaving.
Second, if you happen to be a long-term Muslim resident–or better yet, a Muslim born in Denmark–and all of a sudden someone is stirring up sh*t against you because of your religious background, why, exactly should you leave? Because someone bullies you? Is it a “free country” only for the majority? If that’s the case, it’s not a very enlightened place by any yardstick, and your sunny description just doesn’t apply.
Keeping in mind that every individual is different from any other, why should law-abiding Muslims pay the price for the relative few who can’t fit in? In Sweden, you have the same immigrant demographics as in Denmark, but you don’t have the xenophobia. You also, as a result, have a happier, more integrated minority and, by extension, a more benign multiculturalism. Denmark has, for years, treated two minorities–its Muslims and its Greenlanders–with contempt. Anyone wonder why some of them get pissed off?
Yeah but that’s a peaceful demonstration. Nothing wrong with that. It’s people expressing their right to be outraged. You can’t be in favor of free speech and not be in favor of that.
Encouraging ne’er-do-wells in unrelated countries to stage violent protests, that’s another story… 😉
@ Odinius
I thought Swedish and Danes are of the same stock. I used to drive down from Sweden into Denmark; and their vocab seemed similar. I do not believe Denmark is more xenophobia than others.
Copyright Indonesia Matters 2006-2023
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact
Some true words Mr. President. But let’s look at yourself first. The government, authorities, politicians and senile wacko’s like the MUI should exercise some self-censorship looking at all stupidities and insensible statements uttered from their mouths. Furthermore it’s about time the government and authorities start to enforce the law by protecting the rights, freedoms and sensibilities you mention here, especially those from minority groups. If that will happen journalists and media are more than willing to bring “appropriate” news. Until then the media have the moral duty to stay critical of politics and events and yes, sometimes the truth can be “inappropriate” and hard to swallow.