Does Pancasila mean anything to Indonesians?
The Pancasila
Belief in the One and Only God.
A Just and civilized humanity.
The Unity of Indonesia.
Democracy guided by the inner wisdom of deliberations of representatives.
Social Justice for all the Indonesian people.
The Merit of Pancasila
The Pancasila edicts five principles for the pluralistic citizenry of the Republic of Indonesia. It is an all-encompassing mandate for Indonesians.
Indonesia’s Pancasila in its own right, would share the august stature of the medieval Magna Carta or the American Bill of Rights.
Indonesia Queried
It is 62 years since the introduction of Pancasila in the Republic. How is Pancasila performing vis-Ã -vis the prevailing condition of its populace? Does it in reality support and provide the desired results? Does it serve the purpose for which it was created? Is Pancasila a fait accompli for the thinking process, the social behaviour, the statutes, by-laws and regulations, the parliament deliberations, the sensitive discourses and for solution-seeking in Indonesia?
In essence the Pancasila has to be more than a herald of noble words and aims. Certainly the founding fathers of the Republic never intended the Pancasila to act as a decorative spectacle.
If Pancasila is pervasive, it would make these words of Mencius meaningless in Indonesia. Mencius once said,
It is not difficult to govern. All one has to do is not to offend the noble families.
Inarguably Pancasila embody noble intentions. That being true then noble intentions must commensurate with noble deeds. Having declared noble intentions but instead lacking a commitment to do noble deeds, it renders the intentions hollow and worthless, in short, a farce.
Sure, neither is there any nation on earth that is perfect nor does the Law of God, tenets of Religion and the laws of man create a perfect state. This article is not to be misunderstood as an insidious attempt to expose the imperfections (if there be any) of Pancasila. Rather, it is about whether Pancasila permeates the conscience of Indonesians.
I have done this with a few Indonesians. I broached on the matter of Pancasila and along the discussion I requested them to recite the five principles. If possible, do the same and gauge for yourself how prevalent Pancasila is amongst Indonesians.
Is Pancasila Dormant?
William Weld, Governor of Massachusetts, U.S of A, said:
Government is never so noble as when it is addressing wrongs.
Does the Indonesian Government advocate Pancasila while on several fronts, Indonesians continue to endure wasted opportunities, deprivation, injustice, marginalised minorities, religious intolerance, incompetence and incongruities; all of which Pancasila is opposed to?
To the above mentioned scenario, it would not be inconsistent to say that Pancasila dons the countenance of an attractive lady. That come-hither look as she demurely whispers within, “What you see is not what you get”.
Without commonly shared and widely entrenched moral values and obligations, neither the law, nor democratic government, nor even the market economy will function properly
so said Václav Havel. He was a writer, a fighter for human rights and eventually the President of Czechoslovakia – later on the Czech Republic. His statement compels Indonesia to walk the Pancasila talk.
At sunrise the apt words of Václav Havel should greet particularly those who work within Indonesia’s corridors of power and for all walks of life in Indonesia. It serves as a reminder that there is more to it than vaunting Pancasila at the office or as an adornment at road junctions.
I have two objections to the pancasila.
The first statement – belief in the one and only god – is an insult to the Hindu Pantheon (correct me if I am wrong but Hindus venerate a pile of gods all of which are true as far as Hindus are concerned) and an insult to Buddhists and others who don’t really believe in any God as such.
The remaining principles are so vague as to be meaningless. They are motherhood statements.
If after 62 years you have not put flesh on these ethereal bones – perhaps you should drop the doctrine and start again?
Instead of believing in one god insist on a separation of religion from state and universal human rights as per the UN Declaration. Cracking down on corrupt judges and police and moving your nation up from the bottom of the ladder on the corruption indexes would be better than wasting time on these vague words. Introduce an Anti-Corruption Commission and give it draconian powers and recruit your best and brightest into it. What Indonesia needs is some Untouchables, men of supreme integrity willing to to stamp out corruption in high places. You need some generals in gaol.
Going after yesterdays men like Tommy S is all well and good but you need to get the current practioners trapped, videoed and gaoled. Shoot them like the Bali Bombers and the Bali Nine.
iamisaid:
Thank you WP for sharing your opinion and I wish you A Very Happy New Year!
Ya, wishing you a happy 2008 too 🙂
Yes, but is there such a person of such virtue, strength, courage and selflessness for the cause? Should the gods smile and there is such a man, that man with absolute power will in turn be absolutely corrupt himself. Don’t they all start as men of some vision and promise and in the end “¦..
Rather than one man, I think you need Anti-corruption institutions staffed by a hand picked team of elite people chosen for the purpose. In Australia and other Western jurisdictions these bodies only have investigative power. They do not control the ship of state. They merely serve the function of exposing the corrupt and building a case against them. Then the normal law runs its course.
Of course in Indonesia you might need to set up a special Untouchable court to try corruption cases as well!
It is true. The institution is useless unless those who staff it have the right stuff and the support of the parliament and the judiciary. As these seem to be challenged institutions as well according to Transparency International, it seems hard to see how things can improve. Your only hope is to elect a President who will run on a strong anti-corruption ticket and enforce it. Perhaps that Transparency guy the police are seeking “intel” on will run? I dunno. Maybe a student/intellectual movement will kick things off? There must be a bunch of young Indonesians who have been overseas and who are net savvy and who want to make their country better who can start this off.
It is almost as if you need a Cultural Revolution.
Another tactic, now that I think of it would be to use the net to name and shame. More videos of corrupt cops (and whoever) taking bribes popping up on sites beyond Indonesian govt control. If Indonesians experiencing corruption were to start videotaping the procedings and putting the footage online, you might shame the govt into meaningful action.
Hidden cameras are pretty easy to get these days.
I think Kangaroo with boxing gloves symbolises corruption is more appropriate. Kangaroo has pouch and that is where the dirty money are hidden and laundered. The boxing gloves means they fight back if confronted. You do need to kill it to retrieve the money. Children can even read them at school. I suggest a name like Maksiat the Kangaroo.
@Perseus
Your statements above are true, but something tells me you are not Indonesian.
perseus: Hidden cameras are pretty easy to get these days.
You don’t know what you’re asking…. This cuts both ways.
Indonesia today lacks what was proclaimed in the Pancasila State Ideology.
Belief in the One and Only God.
A Just and civilized humanity.
The Unity of Indonesia.
Democracy guided by the inner wisdom of deliberations of representatives.
Social Justice for all the Indonesian people
How can a democratic society with different religious believes, belief in one God?
If the society is just and civilized then there will be no paedophiles, riots, discriminations. Not at least they hang those corrupt officials.
With that many political parties, bipartisan parliamentarians, bigots and nutheads, everyone is on the ready to be named the head of another independent indonesian state. So how could they be unite. Ya except fpi and jihadis. basyir and glico porky.
If Indonesia is democratic it willl be good enough and to have them with inner wisdom the next thing they will do is to bomb another church, start another sect, raise another party..I mean party.
With continued discrimination the social palatte will not make that to the kitchen.
NICE, your 007 octopussy is just befitting to the sushi. Called it Cakrasila.
And soon it will be made into an efigy..protest crawling all around.ha.ha.ha. you komodo..
Aluang wrote:
I think Kangaroo with boxing gloves symbolises corruption is more appropriate. Kangaroo has pouch and that is where the dirty money are hidden and laundered. The boxing gloves means they fight back if confronted.
Sorry mate, the boxing Kangaroo already represents Australian sporting prowess. It came to prominence when we won the America’s Cup off the Americans about 20 odd years ago. Is usually flown at the cricket, the swimming, the hockey, the netball and various other sports we hopeless, pitable, zero-talent Oz bule are world-beaters at.
Come up with an original form of abuse for a change. Something a little more creative than your usual repetitious and predictable all bule suck rants…
Your statements above are true, but something tells me you are not Indonesian.
No, I am Australian but I like Indonesia. Nice country. Friendly people. Lot of fun. Lot of problems. Nice to see a bunch of people having a serious debate about how to improve things. I think Indonesia has a great opportunity to modernize and bypass many of the errors the Western nations made.
I think on reflection, the idea of outing corrupt police by hidden video is best done by outsiders. As the Canadians who videoed the shakedown in Bali by the traffic cops and put the video on YouTube did. If an Indonesian did this they might be subject to reprisals. Foreigners can always post their footage when they are safely overseas and beyond the reach of corrupt police.
Copyright Indonesia Matters 2006-2023
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact
Well, Pancasila probably means something to Indonesians, but it seems that people also have no aggreement on how it is supposed to mean.
I mean take a look e.g. at “Just and civilized humanity”. Just what on earth does this mean?? Some people considers chopping hands of thieves to be just and civilized, while some others thinks it to be very barbaric.
And what does “Democracy guided by the inner wisdom” mean?? Gus Dur might consider dreams while meditating in some obscure cave as a valid source of inner wisdom, while some would call this pure insanity.
Those principles are just too abstract that they can mean anything. Ergo, in themselves they are not very useful.
But I can imagine that they are valuable as political instruments.