| User | Post |
|
7:12 am September 6, 2009
| Suryo Perkoso
| | |
| Santri | posts 61 | |
|
|
Oh dear. I do hope he won't feel left out. He was a bit naughty, and Peter Sondakh is quite a good geezer as he is buying bits of my new Landcruiser every day.
I do hope that Patung is aware that the other little turd is just as capable of doing anti javanese as dear old PN was of doing anti charlie farly.
|
|
|
9:16 am September 6, 2009
| Odinius
| | |
| Santri | posts 66 | |
|
|
It was a bit more than that, and over a long period of time.
|
|
|
6:01 pm September 6, 2009
| Suryo Perkoso
| | |
| Santri | posts 61 | |
|
|
Odinius said:
It was a bit more than that, and over a long period of time.
And so was the other little turd, he had quite a history in another place, and the first hint of things getting hot, he used to complain to the mods.
Anyhow, where is my old mate Achmad?
|
|
|
8:18 pm September 6, 2009
| Patung
| | |
| Guest
| | |
|
|
Post edited 2:51 am – September 7, 2009 by Patung
I'm not concerned with racism ordinarily unless it's completely over the top and monotonous, I'm far more concerned with juvenile baiting and sniping, which is your problem Suryo, another attempt to wreck a thread here parental-responsibilities-rights-law presently will delete, if you've got nothing useful to say just shut up.
|
|
|
8:38 pm September 6, 2009
| enigmatic
| | |
| Abangan | posts 8 | |
|
|
Post edited 1:42 pm – September 6, 2009 by enigmatic
Odinius said:
Well, I missed the fun in here, so I can't say. But to be fair to Patung, PN was (rightly) banned for life.
He's banned? And for life too?? Oh I've missed too much drama here!
As for Sputjam's comments on the FPDA and M'sia and SG, I think it's unrealistic for Indonesia to try any adventurism at this time. Or ever. Especially since the SAF is so much more powerful than the TNI and not to mention the US bases there. And remember, all 3 countries are founding members of ASEAN and have diverse interlinked interests, eg economic ties and counterterror efforts. I don't think foreign adventurism will help Indonesia.
|
|
|
2:27 am September 7, 2009
| Dragonwall
| | |
| Santri | posts 58 | |
|
|
I really find that there is no difference between the two ofthem.
1. Can build a beautiul astle in the air.
2. Ambiguious yet trying to prove Indonesia's prowess because of the size.
China has reduce their military but not the prowess. In fact they are maintaining a slim but very fit army. And that counts.
Indonesia's large army may be something what the chinese called the americans a paper tiger.
So if for me to guess that will help Indonesia really seemed too far fetch then or perhaps…miracle with Allah and Jihadist help..only sounds interesting. I think the appropriat thing to do now is how to help those people trapped in the Cianjur quake..
|
|
|
2:33 am September 7, 2009
| enigmatic
| | |
| Abangan | posts 8 | |
|
|
Dragonwall said:
Indonesia's large army may be something what the chinese called the americans a paper tiger.
So if for me to guess that will help Indonesia really seemed too far fetch then or perhaps…miracle with Allah and Jihadist help..only sounds interesting. I think the appropriat thing to do now is how to help those people trapped in the Cianjur quake..
Can agree with you on Cianjur. As for paper tigers… I think that's an exaggeration. The TNI, as of now, is still very weak. Budgeting is pathetic and I doubt it's improving anytime soon especially with the TNI Business Law which removes their illicit funding means and all.
|
|
|
3:48 am September 7, 2009
| Dragonwall
| | |
| Santri | posts 58 | |
|
|
< As for paper tigers… I think that's an exaggeration.>
Like what you said
<The TNI, as of now, is still very weak. Budgeting is pathetic and I doubt it's improving anytime soon especially with the TNI Business Law which removes their illicit funding means and all>
So don't you think they are like a paper tiger pretending that they are fierce but in fact more like a pussy! That's what I mean paper tiger. Like American army during the vietnam war the chinese called them paper tigers.
|
|
|
4:07 am September 7, 2009
| Dragonwall
| | |
| Santri | posts 58 | |
|
|
The phrase paper tiger is a literal English translation of the Chinese phrase zhi laohu (紙老虎), meaning something which seems as threatening as a tiger, but is really harmless. The common usage is synonymous with the adjective toothless, meaning ineffective.
The phrase is an ancient one in Chinese, but sources differ as to when it entered the English vocabulary. Although some sources may claim it actually dates back as far as 1850, it seems the Chinese phrase was first translated when it was applied to describe the United States. In 1956, Chairman Mao Zedong, said of the US:
- "In appearance it is very powerful but in reality it is nothing to be afraid of, it is a paper tiger. Outwardly a tiger, it is made of paper, unable to withstand the wind and the rain. I believe the United States is nothing but a paper tiger."
|
|
|
5:51 am September 7, 2009
| Odinius
| | |
| Santri | posts 66 | |
|
|
Dragonwall, what on earth are you talking about? China has 2.25 million active military personnel, or 1 solider per 520 citizens. Indonesia has 430,000 active military personnel, or 1 soldier per 550 citizens.
That means the two armies are fairly equivalent in terms of size relative to population. The crucial differences are that 1) China's military is well funded, and Indonesia's is not; 2) China has a domestic armaments industry; Indonesia does not. Has **** all to do with size.
|
|
|
5:54 am September 7, 2009
| Suryo Perkoso
| | |
| Santri | posts 61 | |
|
|
I'm not concerned with racism ordinarily unless it's completely over the top and monotonous, I'm far more concerned with juvenile baiting and sniping, which is your problem Suryo, another attempt to wreck a thread here http://www.indonesiamatters.co…..rights-law presently will delete, if you've got nothing useful to say just shut up.
Well you should be concerned with blatent racism, if you'd like a published sample from your mate, PM me, I'll let you into a few secrets. As for shutting up in the face of nasty racism – sorry, I can't do that – you'll see why when you read your messages.
And in the stuff you deleted – I think you'll find that the one sensible bit advice is never to take legal advice from the 'net.
|
|
|
7:26 am September 7, 2009
| Dragonwall
| | |
| Santri | posts 58 | |
|
|
This was what someone wrote and quoted
<As for Sputjam's comments on the FPDA and M'sia and SG, I think it's unrealistic for Indonesia to try any adventurism at this time. Or ever>
So I am saying the Indonesian army to be a paper tiger similar to what the Chinese call the Americans in the 50's.
I am not comparing taking China to compare Indonesia. Like what you say
<1) China's military is well funded, and Indonesia's is not; 2) China has a domestic armaments industry; Indonesia does not.>
it is when someone who express that if Indonesia made an attack (this is what I mean as paper tiger) not sure whether Aussie, Brits is keen on participating
|
|
|
9:44 am September 7, 2009
| Odinius
| | |
| Santri | posts 66 | |
|
|
Eh…I replied to this earlier and it disappeared. Anyways, what I said was:
Indonesia attacking China? Unthinkable
China attacking Indonesia? More plausible, due to Indonesia's natural resources, but still highly unlikely.
|
|
|
10:18 am September 7, 2009
| Dragonwall
| | |
| Santri | posts 58 | |
|
|
No Singapore and Malaysia.
For China to attack Indonesia, I don't think so.
looking at the situation of macao and HK that were leased and returned to China, now they are after Taiwan and yet they are not taking any kind of forcible attack to (what their so called) regain back Taiwan. So any posibilities of China attacking Indonesia?
Someone was implying that Indonesia is so strong that they could easily attacked Singapore and Malaysia. And according to him he was indicating that th Brits and Australians were unlikely to participate during such an incident.
So..did you misread the post!
|
|
|
10:21 am September 7, 2009
| Odinius
| | |
| Santri | posts 66 | |
|
|
Hmm…then why bring up China at all?
I doubt there will be an Indonesia vs. Malaysia war, as it would be colossally stupid for both. Think this thing will end with more rotten eggs being thrown, and not bombs dropped.
But I don't see why Singapore would even get involved if there was, given that Singapore has more problems with Malaysia than Indonesia.
|
|
|
10:38 am September 7, 2009
| Dragonwall
| | |
| Santri | posts 58 | |
|
|
Hmmm..When America made threat to China they were called the paper tiger becoz they under estimate China.
When Indonesia makes a threat to people like Singapore and Malaysia are they over estimating their prowess? Base on what you've said, then isn't that similar to a paper tiger?
|
|
|
10:57 am September 7, 2009
| Odinius
| | |
| Santri | posts 66 | |
|
|
When has Indonesia threatened Singapore? I remember it seriously threatening Malaysia in the early 1960s, but that was quite a long time ago.
Second, a paper tiger is a force that appears strong but folds under pressure. Not sure when that would be, as the only time the US and China fought was in Korea, when a much bigger Chinese force, backed by Soviet air power, pushed a smaller US force back from its initial position. The only other confrontation, I hate to tell you, occurred in 1995, when China began war gaming around Taiwan. Enter the US Pacific fleet, and the Chinese suddenly quieted down. Seems like someone else was the "paper tiger" that time.
|
|
|
11:48 am September 7, 2009
| Dragonwall
| | |
| Santri | posts 58 | |
|
|
I thought I was referring to the 50's.
Indonesia threatened Singapore to cut off sand supply, water supply similar to Malaysia threatening Singapore of water supply.
When I was kid my grandfather taught me to listen to the radio on the China American as well as Indonesian issues at that time when Mao Tze Dong and Liu Shao Qi, calling American paper tigers. And I forget what was said when they were referring to Subandrio.
In 1995 China began the war game, that was the time our company in Taiwan lost a lost of money when missile was fired towards Jinmen. The situation i see of China was that they decided not to pursue because of too many Chinese at stake, not because of the US presence.
If you remember once when George Bush visited China on condition that certain activist be released. Li Peng told them to release the political activist. When Bush plane landed in China they immediately had that political activist re-arrested and put in jail in his presence. What does that say of the Chinese?
Do you reallt think that the Chinese is afraid of the US?
Think more into it.
|
|
|
7:07 pm September 7, 2009
| Suryo Perkoso
| | |
| Santri | posts 61 | |
|
|
Dragonwall said:
No Singapore and Malaysia.
For China to attack Indonesia, I don't think so.
looking at the situation of macao and HK that were leased and returned to China, now they are after Taiwan and yet they are not taking any kind of forcible attack to (what their so called) regain back Taiwan. So any posibilities of China attacking Indonesia?
Someone was implying that Indonesia is so strong that they could easily attacked Singapore and Malaysia. And according to him he was indicating that th Brits and Australians were unlikely to participate during such an incident.
So..did you misread the post!
They won't do that, too many brothers and sisters who are chinese-Indonesians rather than Indonesian-chinese will get nailed to the wall before they get close.
And of course let us not forget that China is in a bit of a hole at the moment have amongst other things purchase huge piles of scrap stainless in a view to pushing up the stainless prices, only no one wants any at the moment – and of course, wars don't come cheap, especially to a false economy.
|
|
|
9:46 pm September 7, 2009
| enigmatic
| | |
| Abangan | posts 8 | |
|
|
Guys, we're digressing too much. High time for Reality Check.
This topic is about Indonesia and Malaysia. Why are we digressing into a Chinese attack on Indonesia?
|
|