It is proposed that thieves in Aceh have their hands amputated.
According to international reports iht a draft law in circulation proposes that thieves found guilty of stealing goods worth more than the market price of 94 grams (3 ounces) of gold should have a hand amputated, a punishment which is said to be stipulated in the Koran, and is carried out in a few Islamic countries.
The draft law was published on the 12th in the form of an advertisement in Aceh’s Serambi newspaper that was paid for by the agency responsible for implementing Islamic sharia law, the Wilayatul Hisbah. The advertisement invited submissions and comments on the proposed law so it could be revised before being handed over to the local parliament for review.
________________
February 28th 2007.
The law is still in process and it is expected to be completed by the March. Al Yasa Abubakar, the head of the sharia office, says he hopes the law will lead to all forms of theft in the province disappearing.
The draft law stipulates that hand amputation will be incurred as a punishment only in certain cases, where the value of goods stolen would normally be subject to zakat, or charity tax, and where goods are stolen from their proper place of storage. The latter condition entails that muggers or pickpockets will not be subject to the punishment, and further, first offenders will also not be subject to the punishment; similarly if the offender stole for reasons of desperation, like hunger.
Abubakar said his office had received over 100 SMS messages, telephone calls, and letters stating approval for the proposed law. antara
It seems that these kinds of laws, are for those who are very weak willed. It’s the easy way out and allows humans to be the natural primitive and barbaric beings that they are.
Thieves – cut off their hands!
Adulterers – stone them to death!
Rape victims – jail them! (cos rape victims are usually women, and they must produce at least 4 witnesses otherwise they have no case. In many cases, these women are seen as ‘asking for it’)
Nowhere does it teach humans to be understanding, tolerant, forgiving, good samaritans, compassionate and kind hearted. Why? Cos be to all these things take more courage and guts!
An eye for an eye is the easiest way to succumb to our inner animal, but to be compassionate and forgiving is the hardest.
I read in a media that the father of one of last week’s bomb victim has forgiven the bombers. Now, THAT take guts!
And I agree with most about the hand amputation law, it will only hurt the poor. I saw a chicken thief almost beaten to death by the mass. And he only finally stole because he had no other way to feed his family, while many of our corrupt leaders who keep on stealing from the people enjoy luxurious lives while being ass kissed by half the nation.
If there are people deserving to be amputated, it’s them, not petty thieves.
Suryo – To be blunt, you still haven’t answered my simple (at least I thought) question, would you be happy to be put forward to have your hands removed (if you were, of course, given a ‘fair’ trial) while innocent, simply to act as a deterrent to others?
On another note, you’ve now named two people who have been wrongly convicted, yet state that timothy evans is ‘the only one that springs to mind’. A) ‘the only one that springs to mind’, is hardly conclusive, and B) will there be any more that ‘suddenly spring to mind?’ As far as this goes, might I get you to read from:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/jul/28/ukcrime.prisonsandprobation
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Overturned_convictions_in_the_United_Kingdom
(I realise that one of the above links is from wiki, but i’m relatively sure that given the time and effort I could verify many of these… and there are many)
Now, as far as ‘butter my parsnips’… you have a resounding ??? from myself and i’d beg to venture 99.9% of the English speaking world, please explain.
When it comes to my suggestions failing miserably in the uk, i’d like more of an explanation. Crime seems to be alot lower than in the days of corporal and capital punishment, and education is a proven factor in redusing crime and poverty.
And as far as political correctness goes, how is it waffle? How is it incorrect (the name itself implies correctness, not foolishness)? And why is it that when someone from the right wing of the track attempts to derail a solid argument, this is the first gun they reach for?
I look forward to your next post, but hope you put more research into this issue beforehand.
Micheal, you were doing ok until…
And as far as political correctness goes, how is it waffle? How is it incorrect (the name itself implies correctness, not foolishness)
PC is the indeed the last bastion of the foolish and the first arrow into the heart of free speech. But hey perhaps we should ask a chairperson to adjudicate…
Wow, so many responses. Ok, in order:
I’m not a major advocate of political correctness, yet I see it as providing for much more level and interesting debate than provided by the Anne Coulther’s of the world, who choose to ignore it as much as possible. Having to rely on intellect alone and not prejudicial slurs seems to weed out those who are simply there for a yell and a rant.
As far as crime goes, its important to note that changes in law have made for more arrests over time. For example, the monetary amount related to larceny did not change, and in fact dropped in the 1950’s. By example, a 10 pound item in 1900 would have been worth many times that now, so while you may have gotten away with stealing something of worth a long time ago, today stealing a pair of cheap sneakers may land you in the clink. I’d suggest focusing on murder, as it is in line with the subject here, capital and corporal punishment. Murder rates, in fact have risen, by a minute amount. From around 10 per million of population to 14. Count in this, however, that since forensics has become much more adept in the last hundred years, what in the 1900’s would have been seen as ‘accidental death’ is much more likely to have been an actual murder. Hence I stand by my comment, corporal and capital punishment, do not work.
And Suryo, ah sweet ‘lets string the buggers up’ Suryo. When are you going to answer my question? Would you be happy to have your hands removed to act as a deterrant to others? Keeping in mind the criteria previously stipulated. Or are you, by not answering, in fact admitting that you have no answer, and that you really have not thought this through?
Odinius – I like your thinking, and in hindsight, it probably would have put this issue to bed earlier. At any rate i’m about done with this issue. Not quite though…
Suryo, you still, in fact have not answered my original question, i’ll refer to your previous posts here:
‘In anycase I can’t see what all the fuss is about – stringing up a few, GUILTY OR NOT, serves as an admirable deterrent.’
‘and IF THEY DIDN’T DO IT in the first place, then they won’t be able to commit an offense if the chance comes their way’
Note the capitalised areas, what I was asking, was that if you were one of those innocents convicted, considering your stance, would you smile, and walk quietly to have your hands non-surgically removed? I mean, as you said, guilty or not, you’d be happy to have such a deterrant.
When it comes to me having children? No I dont, I have, however, seen the effects of battered children, and it is not pretty. My cousins had a father who was quick with the belt, and are now the only members of my family to have been in and out of jail their entire lives. If you ask me, i’d link that almost directly to what they put up with in their father. Completely de-sensitised to violence.
As for you mutilating your poor children, let me say that i’m thankful I live nowhere near you, and consider your actions inhumane and monstrous. If you come back with ‘they’re my children and I will do as I please’, then I should hope that when they are adults and have to take care of you, that you dont misbehave.
Christ Suryo, you really like to take things to the extreme dont you? A) you admitted to chopping off your childs fingers and ears, quote ‘one is already missing three fingers, and we cut the ears off the little one.’ Now anyone who finds that sort of treatment towards children appropriate has a screw loose in my book.
B) When did I suggest that we allow murderers to run free with quote ‘flowers in their hair and get them to whistle zipppedeedodah’? I’d suggest that a more appropriate way to repay society would be through forced labour, a lifetime of it if need be, at least you’d be putting them to good use.
As for me ‘having little turds’, I will, and while they will be reprimanded for any wrongdoings, it wont be circa 1850’s punishment. It will be something representing a more civilised attitude, hence teaching that violence is wrong, yet should not be met with more violence. As Ghandi said, an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.
And no, i’ve met plenty of people who have been beaten as children, and they’re not all in jail. My gardener is one, as is my cleaning guy, and the guy who works sorting the mail in my building, spotting a pattern here?
I am glad I live in the UK. A free country, anyone has the right to do what they want. Problem is though that if someone burgal your house – you are advised to let them get on with it and not try and stop them as if you hurt or injure the burglar in any way, the burglar can take you to court for their injuries. Best way to stop yourself getting burgled is to install security locks on doors and windows and put up secutiry lighting outside the house. Burglary is rare thoughm I have never been burgled or assulted yet, and I am nearly 40. These countries with odd religious laws are in the old times. All religions should be banned as they cause hate and terror, they are all just made up myths and no one has ever proved that any sort of god exists. Muslims use the excuse of religion to create terrorists and attacks. If there was no religion, the world would be a lot more of a better place to live. Look at all the scientific evidence.
Copyright Indonesia Matters 2006-2023
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact
It would have a tad more credability if Sharia law in Aceh was applied to someone besides some poor bugger without two Rupiah to rub together.
Of course, the mere fact that no two Muslims can agree what Sharia Law actually is besides some fluid day dream of utopian laws where everyone lives happily ever after.
Witness Malaysian Sharia Banking..disallowed in any number of Arab countries as illegal..
Fatwa against Yoga, Non Voting, any number of religious beliefs but as far as I am aware none against bombs in Indonesia..
Do we wish to get into the differences of Sharia law between Islamic Sects?
Yup..seems a simple, consistant, just and viable system to me…